Skip to main content
Raytron Technical Review RESEARCH ARTICLE WP-06-00

CCAA: Enhanced Mechanical Properties

RAYTRON Technical Team1

1RAYTRON Group, China

Published: March 2026 Version: 1.0
DOI: 10.1234/raytron.2026.WP-01-20

1. Introduction

Standard CCA uses pure aluminum (1350) as core material, limiting mechanical properties. CCAA uses heat-treatable aluminum alloys to enhance performance.

Create alloy core performance comparison chart

MEDIA TODO
Figure Fig. 1 Alloy Core Performance Comparison

2. Aluminum Alloy Core Selection

3. Performance Enhancements

Create fatigue performance S-N curves

MEDIA TODO
Figure Fig. 2 Fatigue Performance S-N Curves

4. Manufacturing Considerations

5. Application Advantages

6. Design Guidelines

7. Conclusion

CCAA outperforms standard CCA in applications requiring high strength, fatigue resistance, and high-temperature performance.

8. References

  1. ASM Handbook Volume 2. (2020). Aluminum Alloys.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between CCAA and standard CCA?

CCAA uses heat-treatable aluminum alloys (such as 6101, 6201) as core material, while standard CCA uses pure aluminum (1350). Alloy cores provide higher strength, better fatigue resistance and creep performance, with slightly reduced conductivity.

How much does CCAA cost compared to CCA?

CCAA material costs 10-30% more than standard CCA, depending on alloy type. CCAA-5005 adds about 10-15%, CCAA-5052 adds 15-25%, CCAA-6061 adds 20-30%. However, considering longer service life and reliability, overall cost-effectiveness is better.

What applications are suitable for CCAA?

CCAA is particularly suitable for high-vibration environments (automotive engine bay wiring), high-temperature applications (transformer windings), aerospace (high-strength lightweight requirements), and industrial machinery (robot wiring). Any application requiring higher mechanical properties than standard CCA can consider CCAA.

How is CCAA's conductivity?

CCAA conductivity depends on alloy core type and copper cladding ratio. CCAA-5052 achieves about 50-55% IACS, CCAA-6061 about 52-58% IACS, slightly lower than standard CCA's 62-68% IACS, but still within acceptable range.

Figures

Create alloy core performance comparison chart

Fig. 1 Alloy Core Performance Comparison

Create fatigue performance S-N curves

Fig. 2 Fatigue Performance S-N Curves

Tables

Table 1 Alloy Systems
AlloyCompositionKey Property
6101Al-Mg-SiGood conductivity + strength
6201Al-Mg-SiHigher strength
5052Al-MgGood corrosion resistance
Table 2 Tensile Strength Comparison
MaterialUTS (MPa)vs CCA Improvement
CCA-1350170-200Baseline
CCAA-6101250-300+47%
CCAA-6201320-380+88%
Table 3 Fatigue Performance
MaterialFatigue Limit (MPa)
CCA-135055
CCAA-610190
CCAA-6201110
Table 4 Application Guide
ApplicationRecommended AlloyReason
AutomotiveCCAA-6101Vibration fatigue
AerospaceCCAA-6201Strength + weight
TransformerCCAA-6101Temperature performance

References

  1. ASM International Aluminum Alloys Handbook ASM (2020)

Contact Raytron Now - Let Every Meter of Material Create Higher Value for You

Our technical team is the author of multiple Chinese national standards, with 30 years of industry experience and 34 patents, delivering professional bimetallic composite material solutions. Contact us for technical support and product quotes.

Email Us WhatsApp
Request Quote Chat on WhatsApp